Cloud comes in many forms. The main types of Cloud are โstratusโ, โcumulusโ, โcirrusโ and โnimbusโ. They donโt look much like each other, but they are all Clouds. The same is true of Cloud computing. No two Clouds look much like each other โ the services are often very different, (and sometimes tenuous), but they all adopt the same moniker. Over the past few years the name โCloudโ has been adopted by everyone from large scale providers of platforms such as AWS, to large SaaS vendors such as Salesforce.com to cable manufacturers, (โcarrying the Cloudโ), and switch manufacturers, (โpowering the Cloudโ).
[easy-tweet tweet=”The term #Cloud has meant whatever the marketing department wanted it to” user=”comparethecloud”]
In fact, the real truth is that the term โCloudโ has really meant whatever the marketing department wanted it to be. It carried very little meaning because it was such a generic term. One might consider this โstratusโ โฆ very wide spread and creating a bit of a fog to cover what is underneath.
The industry is evolving however, and customers are beginning to see around the hype of the marketing department claims. Obvious tenuous claims such as those from the cable manufacturer or the switch manufacturer are filtered out by customers as exactly what they are โฆ marketing hype. These might be described as the โcirrusโ versions of Cloud โฆ wispy and thin with no real substance.
the โcirrusโ versions of Cloud โฆ wispy and thin with no real substance
So, what of other forms of Cloud? There are, of course, those that claim to have โCloudโ offerings that are merely different terms for existing services. For example, an operator offering โCloudโ services when really all that they offer is a managed service, but they think โCloudโ makes it more on trend, or those that offer โCloudโ services for nothing more than one form of hosted environment or another.
[easy-tweet tweet=”True cloud computing is on demand computing” user=”comparethecloud” hashtags=”cloud”]
There are so many of these that they are difficult to identify, the simple test as to whether these services are true โCloudโ or not is to test whether they are an โon demandโ service. True โCloudโ computing is โon demandโ computing, i.e. you can turn it on when you want to and off when you donโt. Those that donโt offer true โon demandโ services are not offering true โCloudโ. One might refer to these as the nimbus โCloudsโ โฆ full of promise but rather unpredictable โ be careful what you choose, you might just get wet!
the nimbus โCloudsโ โฆ full of promise but rather unpredictable
What about those, then, that do offer true โon demandโ Cloud environments? What about AWS or Azure or Softlayer, or what about Salesforce.com or maybe Dropbox? These are, by any measure, true Cloud environments. They are โIaaSโ, (infrastructure as a service), โPaaSโ, (Platform as a Service), or โSaaSโ, (Software as a Service). There is, however, a bit of a problem. They are also huge! Try configuring a server on AWS, for example, it would be less complex to design the ISS!
[easy-tweet tweet=”Try configuring a server on AWS, for example, it would be less complex to design the ISS!”]
There are so many variations on a theme, but ultimately there is equally no flexibility. You get what they want you to have and you have no choice. This isnโt to pick on AWS, the same is true of pretty much all of the giants. Try being an SME customer of someone like Salesforce.com and asking them for variation to your licence โ you would have more chance negotiating with Kim Jong-Un. These large Cloud providers are great, but they are rather like the good old โcumulusโ โ flat at the bottom and all billowy at the top. Great if what you want is at the bottom but impossible to get to speak to anyone at the top!
the good old โcumulusโ โ flat at the bottom and all billowy at the top
There is one final category of Cloud that we havenโt mentioned. This is a sort of hybrid, (not to be confused with โHybrid Cloudโ in compute terms), that is a combination of what is good from the big Cloud providers, but with the flexibility and agility that many customers are looking for. One might refer to these as the โaltocumulusโ โ smaller clouds that form at low altitude and have many shades in their layers.
the โaltocumulusโ โ smaller clouds that form at low altitude and have many shades in their layers
There are a number of these smaller Cloud providers coming up to challenge the huge providers. These providers offer similar on demand computing to the likes of AWS or Azure, but they have much greater agility, lower pricing and more localised offerings, (which suit those concerned about data security in the Cloud). Watch out for Ormuco, Carenza, IaaS365 and MigSolv โ AltoCumulus are the Clouds of the future!
Alex Rabbetts, CEO, MigSolv
Alex has worked in the data centre industry for over 25 years. During this time he has designed and built data centres ranging from very small to very large complex environments in locations across Europe and beyond. Alex has operated data centres both commercially and as enterprise facilities and has a wealth of knowledge about these environments and the equipment that they are designed to support. For the last 12 years Alex has headed up MigSolv, (Migration Solutions), the only specialist data centre consultancy in the UK which he founded. In 2011 Migration Solutions also entered the world of colocation by acquiring its first data centre which has subsequently won a number of awards. Alex is a contributor to the EU Code of Conduct for data centres, Vice President of the European Data Centre Association and a regular contributor to both press and other media as a subject matter expert on data centre environments and operation.